Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Burbank
This post compares Folsom, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $574,300 |
| White | 69% | 70% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 16% | 11% |
| With Kids | 38% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 39 |
| Rentals | 30% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Burbank?
A: Folsom has a smaller population count than Burbank: 75897 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z