Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Beverly Hills
This post compares Folsom, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 69% | 82% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 16% | 9% |
| With Kids | 38% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 43 |
| Rentals | 30% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Beverly Hills?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 75897 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z