Compare-Cities.com
Compare Folsom to Ashland
This post compares Folsom, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Folsom (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 75,897 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $84,884 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $456,600 | $396,400 |
| White | 69% | 44% |
| Black | 4% | 17% |
| Asian | 16% | 20% |
| With Kids | 38% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 40 | 32 |
| Rentals | 30% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Folsom or Ashland?
A: Folsom has a larger population count than Ashland: 75897 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Folsom or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Folsom.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Folsom or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Folsom.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Folsom versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Folsom may include: Livermore, Lake-Forest, and Morgan-Hill.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z