Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fallbrook to South San Francisco
This post compares Fallbrook, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fallbrook (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,121 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $36,878 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $463,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 78% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 3% | 39% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 40% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fallbrook or South San Francisco?
A: Fallbrook has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 31121 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fallbrook or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fallbrook.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fallbrook or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Fallbrook.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fallbrook does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Fallbrook versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fallbrook may include: Ramona, Winter-Gardens, and Cathedral-City.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z