Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Union City
This post compares Fairfield, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $620,200 |
| White | 46% | 21% |
| Black | 14% | 5% |
| Asian | 17% | 53% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 44% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Union City?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than Union City: 112790 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z