Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Tulare
This post compares Fairfield, California to Tulare, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Tulare (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 62,296 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $36,587 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $177,500 |
| White | 46% | 78% |
| Black | 14% | 3% |
| Asian | 17% | 2% |
| With Kids | 41% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 29 |
| Rentals | 44% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Tulare?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than Tulare: 112790 compared with 62296 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Tulare?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Tulare?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Tulare does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 44% for Tulare.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z