Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to South Pasadena
This post compares Fairfield, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $928,500 |
| White | 46% | 54% |
| Black | 14% | 3% |
| Asian | 17% | 29% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 44% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or South Pasadena?
A: Fairfield has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 112790 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z