Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Sanger
This post compares Fairfield, California to Sanger, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Sanger (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 24,883 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $35,793 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $178,900 |
| White | 46% | 77% |
| Black | 14% | 0% |
| Asian | 17% | 2% |
| With Kids | 41% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Sanger?
A: Fairfield has a much larger population count than Sanger: 112790 compared with 24883 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Sanger?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Sanger?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 42% for Sanger.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z