Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to San Francisco
This post compares Fairfield, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $927,400 |
| White | 46% | 47% |
| Black | 14% | 5% |
| Asian | 17% | 34% |
| With Kids | 41% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 44% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or San Francisco?
A: Fairfield has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 112790 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z