Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to San Bruno
This post compares Fairfield, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 46% | 49% |
| Black | 14% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 28% |
| With Kids | 41% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or San Bruno?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than San Bruno: 112790 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z