Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Riverbank
This post compares Fairfield, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $247,200 |
| White | 46% | 79% |
| Black | 14% | 0% |
| Asian | 17% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Riverbank?
A: Fairfield has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 112790 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z