Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Fairfield, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $444,200 |
| White | 46% | 62% |
| Black | 14% | 9% |
| Asian | 17% | 13% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 44% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Fairfield has a smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 112790 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z