Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Pasadena
This post compares Fairfield, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $689,700 |
| White | 46% | 53% |
| Black | 14% | 10% |
| Asian | 17% | 16% |
| With Kids | 41% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
| Rentals | 44% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Pasadena?
A: Fairfield has a similar population count than Pasadena: 112790 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z