Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to National City
This post compares Fairfield, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $345,400 |
| White | 46% | 61% |
| Black | 14% | 5% |
| Asian | 17% | 19% |
| With Kids | 41% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or National City?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than National City: 112790 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or National City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z