Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Livermore
This post compares Fairfield, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $643,200 |
| White | 46% | 78% |
| Black | 14% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 10% |
| With Kids | 41% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Livermore?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than Livermore: 112790 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z