Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Lancaster
This post compares Fairfield, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $213,100 |
| White | 46% | 62% |
| Black | 14% | 21% |
| Asian | 17% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Lancaster?
A: Fairfield has a smaller population count than Lancaster: 112790 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lancaster does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z