Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Irvine
This post compares Fairfield, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $753,400 |
| White | 46% | 47% |
| Black | 14% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 41% |
| With Kids | 41% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 34 |
| Rentals | 44% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Irvine?
A: Fairfield has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 112790 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z