Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Fresno
This post compares Fairfield, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $206,800 |
| White | 46% | 56% |
| Black | 14% | 7% |
| Asian | 17% | 13% |
| With Kids | 41% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 30 |
| Rentals | 44% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Fresno?
A: Fairfield has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 112790 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z