Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Foster City
This post compares Fairfield, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 46% | 43% |
| Black | 14% | 2% |
| Asian | 17% | 47% |
| With Kids | 41% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 44% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Foster City?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than Foster City: 112790 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z