Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Foothill Farms
This post compares Fairfield, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $201,200 |
| White | 46% | 67% |
| Black | 14% | 9% |
| Asian | 17% | 5% |
| With Kids | 41% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 44% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Foothill Farms?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 112790 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z