Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Belmont
This post compares Fairfield, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 46% | 62% |
| Black | 14% | 1% |
| Asian | 17% | 27% |
| With Kids | 41% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 44% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Belmont?
A: Fairfield has a much larger population count than Belmont: 112790 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 44% for Fairfield versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z