Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Ashland
This post compares Fairfield, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $396,400 |
| White | 46% | 44% |
| Black | 14% | 17% |
| Asian | 17% | 20% |
| With Kids | 41% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 44% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Ashland?
A: Fairfield has a much larger population count than Ashland: 112790 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z