Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fairfield to Altadena
This post compares Fairfield, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fairfield (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112,790 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $51,969 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $341,500 | $649,800 |
| White | 46% | 53% |
| Black | 14% | 22% |
| Asian | 17% | 6% |
| With Kids | 41% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 43 |
| Rentals | 44% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fairfield or Altadena?
A: Fairfield has a larger population count than Altadena: 112790 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fairfield or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fairfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fairfield or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fairfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 44% for Fairfield versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fairfield may include: Pittsburg, Hayward, and Antioch.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z