Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Westminster
This post compares Eureka, California to Westminster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Westminster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 91,785 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $43,283 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $546,200 |
| White | 75% | 39% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 48% |
| With Kids | 23% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 41 |
| Rentals | 54% | 47% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Westminster?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Westminster: 27024 compared with 91785 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Westminster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Westminster?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 47% for Westminster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z