Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Eureka, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $322,800 |
| White | 75% | 36% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 10% |
| With Kids | 23% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 54% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or South San Jose Hills?
A: Eureka has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 27024 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z