Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Eureka, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $374,600 |
| White | 75% | 81% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 3% |
| With Kids | 23% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 38 |
| Rentals | 54% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 27024 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z