Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to South El Monte
This post compares Eureka, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $389,400 |
| White | 75% | 59% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 14% |
| With Kids | 23% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 54% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or South El Monte?
A: Eureka has a larger population count than South El Monte: 27024 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z