Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Selma
This post compares Eureka, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $171,200 |
| White | 75% | 78% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 23% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 30 |
| Rentals | 54% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Selma?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than Selma: 27024 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z