Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to San Fernando
This post compares Eureka, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $370,300 |
| White | 75% | 57% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 1% |
| With Kids | 23% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or San Fernando?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than San Fernando: 27024 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z