Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to San Bruno
This post compares Eureka, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $754,700 |
| White | 75% | 49% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 28% |
| With Kids | 23% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or San Bruno?
A: Eureka has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 27024 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z