Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Riverside
This post compares Eureka, California to Riverside, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Riverside (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 321,570 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $41,576 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $319,200 |
| White | 75% | 61% |
| Black | 2% | 6% |
| Asian | 7% | 7% |
| With Kids | 23% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 31 |
| Rentals | 54% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Riverside?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Riverside: 27024 compared with 321570 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Riverside?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Riverside?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 45% for Riverside.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z