Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Eureka, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $633,400 |
| White | 75% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 23% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Pleasant Hill?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than Pleasant Hill: 27024 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z