Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Palm Springs
This post compares Eureka, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $340,600 |
| White | 75% | 83% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 23% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 54 |
| Rentals | 54% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Palm Springs?
A: Eureka has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 27024 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z