Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Los Angeles
This post compares Eureka, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $549,800 |
| White | 75% | 52% |
| Black | 2% | 8% |
| Asian | 7% | 11% |
| With Kids | 23% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 35 |
| Rentals | 54% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Los Angeles?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 27024 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z