Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Long Beach
This post compares Eureka, California to Long Beach, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Long Beach (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 470,489 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $46,054 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $476,400 |
| White | 75% | 52% |
| Black | 2% | 12% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 23% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 54% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Long Beach?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Long Beach: 27024 compared with 470489 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Long Beach?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Long Beach?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Long Beach does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 60% for Long Beach.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z