Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Lompoc
This post compares Eureka, California to Lompoc, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Lompoc (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 43,762 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $36,752 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $269,100 |
| White | 75% | 64% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 7% | 3% |
| With Kids | 23% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 54% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Lompoc?
A: Eureka has a smaller population count than Lompoc: 27024 compared with 43762 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Lompoc?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Lompoc?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Lompoc does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 57% for Lompoc.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z