Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Livermore
This post compares Eureka, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $643,200 |
| White | 75% | 78% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 10% |
| With Kids | 23% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Livermore?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Livermore: 27024 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z