Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Lathrop
This post compares Eureka, California to Lathrop, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Lathrop (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 21,050 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $47,279 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $292,900 |
| White | 75% | 44% |
| Black | 2% | 6% |
| Asian | 7% | 25% |
| With Kids | 23% | 52% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Lathrop?
A: Eureka has a larger population count than Lathrop: 27024 compared with 21050 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Lathrop?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Lathrop?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 29% for Lathrop.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z