Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Lancaster
This post compares Eureka, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $213,100 |
| White | 75% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 21% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 23% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 32 |
| Rentals | 54% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Lancaster?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 27024 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z