Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Lake Forest
This post compares Eureka, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Eureka (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,024 | 81,812 |
Income (median) | $33,280 | $64,458 |
Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $585,100 |
White | 75% | 67% |
Black | 2% | 2% |
Asian | 7% | 15% |
With Kids | 23% | 34% |
Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
Rentals | 54% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Lake Forest?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 27024 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z