Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Laguna Hills
This post compares Eureka, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $649,700 |
| White | 75% | 69% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 14% |
| With Kids | 23% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 41 |
| Rentals | 54% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Laguna Hills?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than Laguna Hills: 27024 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z