Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to La Verne
This post compares Eureka, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $535,900 |
| White | 75% | 74% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 7% |
| With Kids | 23% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 43 |
| Rentals | 54% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or La Verne?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than La Verne: 27024 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z