Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Fresno
This post compares Eureka, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Eureka (city) | Fresno (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,024 | 519,037 |
Income (median) | $33,280 | $39,069 |
Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $206,800 |
White | 75% | 56% |
Black | 2% | 7% |
Asian | 7% | 13% |
With Kids | 23% | 41% |
Age (median) | 37 | 30 |
Rentals | 54% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Fresno?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 27024 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z