Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Foster City
This post compares Eureka, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 75% | 43% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 47% |
| With Kids | 23% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Foster City?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than Foster City: 27024 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z