Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Foothill Farms
This post compares Eureka, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $201,200 |
| White | 75% | 67% |
| Black | 2% | 9% |
| Asian | 7% | 5% |
| With Kids | 23% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Foothill Farms?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 27024 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z