Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Folsom
This post compares Eureka, California to Folsom, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Folsom (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 75,897 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $84,884 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $456,600 |
| White | 75% | 69% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 16% |
| With Kids | 23% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Folsom?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Folsom: 27024 compared with 75897 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Folsom?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Folsom?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 30% for Folsom.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z