Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Eureka, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $154,600 |
| White | 75% | 70% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 7% | 2% |
| With Kids | 23% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 54% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Eureka has a similar population count than Desert Hot Springs: 27024 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z