Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Culver City
This post compares Eureka, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Eureka (city) | Culver City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,024 | 39,432 |
Income (median) | $33,280 | $65,816 |
Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $735,600 |
White | 75% | 62% |
Black | 2% | 7% |
Asian | 7% | 15% |
With Kids | 23% | 27% |
Age (median) | 37 | 40 |
Rentals | 54% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Culver City?
A: Eureka has a smaller population count than Culver City: 27024 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z