Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Chino Hills
This post compares Eureka, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $567,200 |
| White | 75% | 46% |
| Black | 2% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 33% |
| With Kids | 23% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 38 |
| Rentals | 54% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Chino Hills?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 27024 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Eureka versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z