Compare-Cities.com
Compare Eureka to Bellflower
This post compares Eureka, California to Bellflower, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Eureka (city) | Bellflower (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,024 | 77,852 |
| Income (median) | $33,280 | $40,092 |
| Home Value (median) | $249,300 | $398,000 |
| White | 75% | 32% |
| Black | 2% | 13% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 23% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 54% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Eureka or Bellflower?
A: Eureka has a much smaller population count than Bellflower: 27024 compared with 77852 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Eureka or in Bellflower?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Eureka.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Eureka or Bellflower?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Eureka.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellflower does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Eureka versus 60% for Bellflower.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Eureka may include: South-Lake-Tahoe, Redding, and Citrus-Heights.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z